In a manuscript published in the journal CHEST, a group of experts discuss recent evidence concerning the benefit, harms, and implementation of low-radiation dose chest computed tomography (CT) in lung cancer screening.
The study is titled “Screening for Lung Cancer: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report.” The team also presented its findings at the 2017 CHEST Annual Meeting, in Toronto, Canada (Oct. 28 – Nov. 1).
Lung cancer mortality each year continues to increase and surpasses that of colon, breast and prostate cancers combined. Currently, based on results from the National Lung Cancer Screening Trial, low-dose CT is a standard practice and considered an efficient screening method for high-risk individuals.
One of the key recommendations of the new guidelines is that annual screening with low-dose CT should be offered to asymptomatic smokers and former smokers – ages 55 to 77 years – who have smoked intensively (30 pack-years or more), continue to smoke, or have quit within the past 15 years.
In contrast, the guidelines do not recommend a routinely low-dose CT screening on asymptomatic smokers and former smokers who fall out of the previous terms, but are considered to be at high risk for having or developing lung cancer.
The same recommendation is for individuals who have fewer than 30 pack-years of smoking or are not included in the 55 to 77 age range, and for those who have quit smoking more than 15 years ago, and do not have a high risk of having/developing lung cancer according to clinical risk prediction calculations.
Individuals who have comorbidities (presence of other conditions) that have a detrimental impact to their capacity to sustain evaluation of screen-detected findings, or tolerate treatment of an early stage screen-detected lung cancer, or that substantially limit their life expectancy, also are not recommended to low-dose CT screening.
“This guideline differs from our previous guideline as we went beyond discussing harms and benefits,” Peter Mazzone, MD, and guideline chair, said in a press release.
“We addressed implementation of low-dose CT screening, including who to screen, how to identify appropriate patients for screening, how to conduct a shared-decision-making visit, how to perform LDCT [low-dose CT] and how to manage abnormal findings,” he added.
The team said a balance is needed between risk and screening.
“The potential benefit of cancer screening to reduce the number of cancer-related deaths must be balanced with potential harms of screening,” said Gerard Silvestri, MD, guideline panelist and CHEST immediate past president.
“Current evidence suggests that even within groups at high risk of developing a cancer, only a small fraction of those screened will benefit, while everyone screened is exposed to potential harms including physical and psychosocial consequences of identifying and subsequently evaluating a screen-detected nodule, radiation exposure, overdiagnosis and overtreatment,” he continued.
“For this reason, our recommendations for screening have evolved to be even more selective and specifically target those highest risk populations. The evidence currently does not support widespread adoption of lung cancer screening outside of those patients described in our recommendations” Silvestri concluded.
We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!
Let us improve this post!
Tell us how we can improve this post?